English Question

Short essay
should be analytical in nature, that is, it needs to respond to the work by discussing the work in
context, such as in reference to the themes of the question at hand. Basically, you should make an
argument about the work and support it with evidence from the book.
Your essay should do this by using quotes from the work as examples to further your argument
about the work. For instance, you can point to a particular moment/quote in the assigned reading
and discuss and analyze the quoted passage. In other words, explicate the quoted material in your
paper. What is the writer doing here? What are they saying? How are they saying it? How does
the passage support your argument? Remember, you can explore any specific aspect of the work
in this paper as evidence to support your argument (a scene, a character, a setting, etc).
Things to keep in mind for essay writing:
1. Make sure you have a clear discernible central argument. State your argument at the
beginning of the essay, such as at the end of the first paragraph. This will be your
thesis statement.
2. Paragraphs should deal with one particular point at a time.
3. Make sure to close read specific passages from the texts to solidify your argument.
4. This is not a summary assignment where you simply summarize the material! I want
you to analyze the works and use it in support of your thesis/argument.
5. Feel free to refer to the classroom discussion and notes you have been taking all
semester.
6. When you work with quotations, introduce and explain them. When you quote or
paraphrase from the literary texts or articles, use MLA parenthetical citations.

This question has been answered by our writers. You can buy the answer below or order your 0% plagiarized answer

Movie/Documentary review on Ethics in Organizations.

Watch one movie/documentary related to the topic of Ethics in Organizations and submit an Individual Term Paper on or before October 31, 2021. Suggested movie/documentary film includes as follows:
Walmart: The High Cost of Low Price (2005)
Devil Wears Prada (2006)
The Corporation (2003)
Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room (2005)
Following the APA/MLA guidelines, the individual term paper will have a minimum of 1500 words to include the following structure/segments:
Background and organization – Describe the film in general terms including its plot and setting. The scope of looking at what subject on ethics does it cover and what ethical issues does it raise or aim to amplify?
Purpose and arguments – This is a section where narratives on what are the major ethical themes of the film, are there any literary techniques such as symbolism and character development used in the film, and what do you see is the main purpose of the film?
Critical analysis and evaluation – This segment emphasizes your perception of the strengths and weaknesses of the film based on the ethical theories, concepts, and discussions that you have learned from the class as well as your personal/professional experiences. The perception will have to be elevated at the level of critical analysis by utilizing scholar/academic sources used in the class and vis-à-vis its application to real corporate/organizational realities.
Summary and recommendation.

This question has been answered by our writers. You can buy the answer below or order your 0% plagiarized answer

Psychology Question

:
Consider the following scenario: You are designing a research study to determine the
effects of a new medication to treat Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in
children. Would you choose to conduct a correlational study or an experimental
study? In addition, would you choose a cross-sectional or a longitudinal design?
in explaining your choices, be sure to discuss:

a. Your research designs. Give specific details about designs and procedures.
State why you chose these designs.

b. The pros and cons of the research designs you selected. How they would affect
the conclusions you are able to draw from your specific study.
c. How you would examine the effects of genetics and environment by incorporating
a twin study design.
d. Finally, discuss what steps you would take to ensure compliance with APA
ethical standards for conducting research with children.
Use this as a resource, Standard 8: American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical
principles of psychologist and code of conduct.

This question has been answered by our writers. You can buy the answer below or order your 0% plagiarized answer

chemestry lab

In the reactions presented below, how many redox reactions are there?
HCl(aq) NaOH(aq) → NaCl(aq) H2O(l)
CH4(g) 2O2(g) → CO2(g) 2H2O(l)
AgNO3(aq) NaCl(aq) → AgCl(s) NaNO3(aq)
2H2(g) O2(g) → 2H2O(l)
HCl(aq) NaHCO3(aq) → NaCl(aq) CO2(g) H2O(l)
2C6H6(l) 15O2(g) → 12CO2(g) 6H2O(l)
CuSO4(aq) Mg(s) → Cu(s) MgSO4(aq)

Group of answer choices

1

5

3

2

4

0

This question has been answered by our writers. You can buy the answer below or order your 0% plagiarized answer

ENGLISH 101 Working with Words in the World

Working with Words in the World
ENGL 101: College Composition I is a general education course designed to assist students in the development of critical life skills. One of the goals of this assignment is to assess student competence for each of these objectives:
Written and Oral Communication— apply conventions to varied writing assignments according to genre, discipline, and/or occasion (CCO7)
Critical Analysis and Reasoning— respond to a situation or text using evidence-based research, logical argumentation, and a variety of ethical perspectives (CCO2)
Technological Competence— use contemporary technology to produce work that responds to a variety of audiences (CCO8).
Information Literacy— find, evaluate, use, and cite resources appropriate to a given rhetorical situation according to institutional standards of academic integrity (CCO4)
Local and Global Diversity— examine issues of global and local diversity through critical thinking, reading, and writing (CCO5)
In addition to the above general education objectives, this assignment assesses students’ understanding and application of the following skills and knowledge specific to:
Recursive Writing
Critical Reading
Critical Thinking
Critical Research
ASSIGNMENT: This project asks students to engage in research about a topic of interest to them. It includes three parts: a research component where students engage in inquiry; an image component where students use images to refine their thinking; and a genre component in which students write to specific audiences.
Purpose: This assignment gives students practice in the process of inquiry and rhetoric.
Audience: Part 1

This question has been answered by our writers. You can buy the answer below or order your 0% plagiarized answer

Ethics: Case Study

Hi! This is an ethics case study. I have attached the case study and the guilelines:
Do not exceed two pages, double-spaced. Please use subheadings to differentiate the different sections, (for example: 1. Pertinent facts:………… 2. Ethical Issue: Is it ethical…….). Please do not use bullet points. Remember, you need to use one objective norm, not two. The approved objective norms are Principlism, Utilitarianism, Natural Law, and Kantianism.Please reach out to me if you have questions.

This question has been answered by our writers. You can buy the answer below or order your 0% plagiarized answer

Summarize scholarly research on 1 of 4 topics

Total word count at least 1000
Goal: Social science research progresses by scholars building on the work of prior scholars. This assignment is intended to have you practice identifying prior scholarship on a research topic and summarize the views in those articles so you can build on others (and avoid “re-inventing the wheel”).
Remember: Criteria for success are in the rubric!
Write an essay summarizing the scholarly research (research from peer reviewed articles from ProQuest) on ONE of the following
What are three important factors (IVs) that explain why some college students binge drink and others do not?
What are three important factors (IVs) that explain why school shootings occur when or where they do?
What are three important factors (IVs) that explain why some types of youth vape and some do not?
What are three important factors (IVs) that explain voter turnout (why some Americans vote and other Americans do not vote) across different demographic categories?
Essentially your essay should tell the reader how experts would explain some social phenomenon.
Pro tip: Use headings in your essay to clarify your argument. Headings make any paper stronger. For examples, see the headings in the articles you have been reading!
I. Explicitly state which question you have chosen in your opening paragraph, You can use more specific versions of these questions to focus your research. A good introduction paragraph will ALSO tell the reader the answer to the question. For example:
What explains why binge drinking is more common in colleges on Earth than on Mars? Scholars suggest that the best explanations (causes) of there being more binge drinking on Earth than Mars are a) Martians are less susceptible to alcohol’s effects than Earthlings, b) Martian law bans drinking until Martians are 50 years old and Earthling law does not, and c) Martians find drunkenness less attractive than Earthlings.
II. Using the ProQuest database
Identify three peer-reviewed social science journal articles that discuss your research question.
You MUST use this database and no others, because it ensures you have reliable sources. Other websites, newspaper/magazine articles, blogs, etc. are NOT acceptable. 10 points deducted for each article not from ProQuest.
Ensure one (and preferably all 3) articles include theoretical claims and describe evidence related to your research question.
I recommend you use 3 articles — only 1 or 2 gives you only 1 or 2 views of the IVs, while 3 begins to give you a sense of what IVs scholar agree on. I don’t recommend more than 3 for this assignment only to help keep the workload manageable!!! (I revised this part of the assignment on Monday, 10/25 at 3:40 this — it PREVIOUSLY said: Do NOT use more than three articles.)

III. Read the three articles you have identified and look for the IVs that all three argue are important as explanations of your DV.
IV. Write at least one paragraph that discusses the dependent variable (DV – the thing you want to explain) and what values it varies between.
Example of one sentence in such a paragraph: School shootings in the US vary between X per year in 1900 and Y per year in 1910. [Then, provide more detail of the facts about school shootings that need explanation.]
V. Write three paragraphs, one for each of your three independent variables (IVs), that the articles you are using argue influence the dependent variable (DV). Address the following:
Identify EACH of your 3 IVs and the values EACH can have.Example: Articles by Wesson (2014) and Baretta (2018) argue that increases in school shootings are due to increased gun sales. The variable “gun sales” can have possible values of “none,” “some,” and “lots.” This made-up example is for one IV, you need 3.

Describe the LOGIC in the articles about how EACH IV influences (causes variation in) the DV.Example: These authors say that increases in the sales of guns lead to increased school shootings because people with knives can kill fewer people. Be careful and make sure your IV explains the DV you selected.

Discuss agreements and disagreements across articles about the influence of your three IVs.Example: Smith (2012) disagrees with Wesson (2014) and Baretta (2018) that more guns lead to more school shootings. She argues that a study from a Martian town (no guns are sold on Mars) showed that school knife attacks occur at similar rates to those in the US.

VI. Write at least one paragraph about how you could conduct your own research to help us better understand the dependent variable (DV) you chose.
Example of ONE sentence — but you need a paragraph: To better understand why school shootings occur, I would compare 50 US states in terms of number of gun stores and number of school shootings.
VII. Write a conclusion.
Rubric
Short Research Essay #1 – Summarize scholarly research
CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeJournal Articles*Paper incorporates 3 articles (from ProQuest). 10 points deducted for each article not from ProQuest.*How well do your articles ‘fit’ together and answer the question you chose?
100 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Question / Intro*Restates the question in their own words.*Summarizes the answers scholars give to the question.
100 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDependent Variable*Identifies the dependent variable you are researching; gives at least one paragraph of explanation based on how scholars discuss it.*Tells us how the dependent variable varies over time and context.*Makes sure dependent variable matches what you are trying to explain
300 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIndependent VariablesOne paragraph on each of the 3 independent variables, including identifying values each IV can have, and the logic (mental model) of how variation in IVs might be expected (based on prior research) to cause variation in the dependent variable.
300 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverview of the Discussion in the Literature*Discuss if and how the articles you have selected agree/disagree on the IVs’ relations to the DV
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConducting your own research*Writes at least one paragraph on conducting research to generate new understanding of DV*Identifies where your potential research would ‘fit’ in the literature on your dependent variable
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyleWell written, with professional formatting, **citations**, and an alphabetized references list. Used headings (as noted in the Pro tip above)
100 pts
Total Points: 1,000
PreviousNext

This question has been answered by our writers. You can buy the answer below or order your 0% plagiarized answer

MATH 153 Fall 2021 Inferences from Data on the “Working Poor” in the U.S

:MATH 153: Introductory Statistics is a general education course designed to assist students in the development of critical life skills. One of the goals of this assignment is to assess student competence for each of these objectives:
Written and Oral Communication— effectively communicate the results of a statistical analysis.
Critical Analysis and Reasoning—perform hypothesis testing to draw inferences regarding parameters.
Technological Competence— select appropriate technology to manage data, explore data, perform inference, and check conditions.
Scientific and Quantitative or Logical Reasoning— analyze bivariate data using linear regression, generate and interpret statistical graphs.
Personal and Professional Ethics— construct a solution to real world problems.
ASSIGNMENT: There is a population of workers in this country who are employed but who do not earn enough in wages to securely cover the cost of their family’s basic needs. Although the numbers vary by state or district, these individuals and their families are similar in that they cross racial, cultural, and local boundaries. They are considered the nation’s “Working Poor.” This common graded assignment was designed to allow you, the Introductory Statistics student, to explore some data that may be related to this population. Through the use of multiple statistical concepts covered in your MATH 153 course you will complete the provided assignment below to demonstrate your understanding of the manipulation of data, the use of technology in statistical analysis, the relationships between related variables, estimating population parameters, and hypothesis testing.
Purpose: To assess your understanding of selected key statistical concepts through the use of real-world data related to the working poor in the U.S.
Audience: Present responses as if addressing individuals with a basic but thorough mastery of the appropriate statistical concepts and procedures required for the completion of this assignment.
Directions: Please complete this assignment by responding specifically to each of the items 1-15, provided. According to the instructions you will be expected to use technology to make calculations, to create and include graphical displays, and to support your responses with complete, well-organized, and clear statements and interpretations.

ASSIGNMENT SPECIFICATIONS:
All assignments must be completed using word processing software like Word.
All responses must be typed in Times New Roman 12-pt font.
Page margins should be set to 1” all around.
Approximately 5 pages typed, and double-spaced.
Include requested graphical displays using cut and paste from statistical software.
You will use the included data file on the Working Poor to complete the project.
On your submission, please type each question with your answer below each question.
GRADING:
This assignment will account for 10% of the total course grade.

This question has been answered by our writers. You can buy the answer below or order your 0% plagiarized answer

Nursing Question

For this assessment, you will evaluate the preliminary care coordination plan you developed in Assessment 1 using best practices found in the literature.Introduction
NOTE: You are required to complete this assessment after Assessment 1 is successfully completed.Care coordination is the process of providing a smooth and seamless transition of care as part of the health continuum. Nurses must be aware of community resources, ethical considerations, policy issues, cultural norms, safety, and the physiological needs of patients. Nurses play a key role in providing the necessary knowledge and communication to ensure seamless transitions of care. They draw upon evidence-based practices to promote health and disease prevention to create a safe environment conducive to improving and maintaining the health of individuals, families, or aggregates within a community. When provided with a plan and the resources to achieve and maintain optimal health, patients benefit from a safe environment conducive to healing and a better quality of life.This assessment provides an opportunity to research the literature and apply evidence to support what communication, teaching, and learning best practices are needed for a hypothetical patient with a selected health care problem.You are encouraged to complete the Vila Health: Cultural Competence activity prior to completing this assessment. Completing course activities before submitting your first attempt has been shown to make the difference between basic and proficient assessment.Preparation
In this assessment, you will evaluate the preliminary care coordination plan you developed in Assessment 1 using best practices found in the literature.To prepare for your assessment, you will research the literature on your selected health care problem. You will describe the priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family members. You will identify changes to the plan based upon EBP and discuss how the plan includes elements of Healthy People 2030.Note: Remember that you can submit all, or a portion of, your plan to Smarthinking Tutoring for feedback, before you submit the final version for this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback.Instructions
Note: You are required to complete Assessment 1 before this assessment.For this assessment:Build on the preliminary plan, developed in Assessment 1, to complete a comprehensive care coordination plan.
Document Format and LengthBuild on the preliminary plan document you created in Assessment 1. Your final plan should be a scholarly APA-formatted paper, 5–7 pages in length, not including title page and reference list.Supporting EvidenceSupport your care coordination plan with peer-reviewed articles, course study resources, and Healthy People 2030 resources. Cite at least three credible sources.Grading RequirementsThe requirements, outlined below, correspond to the grading criteria in the Final Care Coordination Plan Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected health care problem. Address three health care issues.
Design an intervention for each health issue.
Identify three community resources for each health intervention.

Consider ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions. Consider the practical effects of specific decisions.
Include the ethical questions that generate uncertainty about the decisions you have made.

Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care. Cite specific health policy provisions.

Describe priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family member, making changes based upon evidence-based practice. Clearly explain the need for changes to the plan.

Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document. Use the literature on evaluation as guide to compare learning session content with best practices.
Align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document.

Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Additional RequirementsBefore submitting your assessment, proofread your final care coordination plan to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your plan.Portfolio Prompt: Save your presentation to your ePortfolio. Submissions to the ePortfolio will be part of your final Capstone course.Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:Competency 1: Adapt care based on patient-centered and person-focused factors. Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected health care problem.

Competency 2: Collaborate with patients and family to achieve desired outcomes. Describe priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family member, making changes based upon evidence-based practice.

Competency 3: Create a satisfying patient experience. Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document.

Competency 4: Defend decisions based on the code of ethics for nursing. Consider ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions.

Competency 5: Explain how health care policies affect patient-centered care. Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care.

Competency 6: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead patient-centered care. Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

This question has been answered by our writers. You can buy the answer below or order your 0% plagiarized answer

Psychology Question

Paper Topic
Instructions
Note that all final papers in this class will be automatically evaluated for similarity to other sources (ie, plagiarism) by TurnItIn upon submission!
The TurnItIn database includes published scientific literature, textbooks, and student papers submitted to universities across the globe, including UMGC. For more information about this and the paper requirements, please review the Syllabus and the project assignment folder in the Week 7 content.
Please copy/paste or type your proposed paper topic (a few words or a sentence) into the assignment window after carefully reviewing these guidelines:
Since students sometimes need a little help landing on a paper topic that meets this assignment’s requirements, I ask that you have your topic approved by me early in the semester to avoid significant loss of points, or wasted time.
A proposed topic is all that’s required here (just to make sure you’re on target to satisfy the requirements of the paper)– no need for a summary, explanation, bibliography, or any further elaboration (this is only worth 1 point, after all).
Your paper should explore the intersection of biology and psychology, so the topic you propose should explicitly denote both a psychological and a biological component. To decide on a topic, I recommend starting with a psychological construct that you’re interested in, then doing a brief literature review to look for biological components of that construct for which you won’t have trouble finding sources.
EXAMPLE: If you’re interested in writing about PTSD (which is a psychological construct), do a quick search of the scientific literature to find a topic (or topics) of interest from current research on the biology of PTSD (please do not simply use a Google search, as it does not restrict results to primary peer-reviewed scientific literature). Example topics might include research on the brain structures involved in PTSD, neurotransmitters that mediate PTSD, genetic or biochemical links to the propensity for developing PTSD, drug treatments for PTSD and their mechanism of action, among many other possibilities– any research related to the biological mechanisms underlying the psychological manifestation of PTSD. Propose a topic that explicitly states both the psychological construct and the biological mechanism(s) you will explore– for example, “Current Drug Treatments for PTSD and How They Change Brain Chemistry to Alleviate Symptoms”, or “PTSD: How it Changes the Brain to Produce its Symptoms”, or similar.
Please do not submit a topic proposal that says simply, for example, “I’d like to write my paper on PTSD”, as this only satisfies HALF of the requirement (you are only stating a psychological component).
Once the assignment due date has passed, I will review your topics and approve them, or make recommendations for revision. If I ask you to revise your topic, please do so via email as soon as possible.
Please also note that you may change or adjust your topic later, for whatever reason, but you should clear any changes with me right away to ensure that I agree the new topic is appropriate.
Due Date
Nov 2, 2021 11:59 PM
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin®
Turnitin® enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.
Instructions
Note that all final papers in this class will be automatically evaluated by TurnItIn for similarity to other sources (ie, plagiarism) upon submission!
The TurnItIn database includes published scientific literature, textbooks, and student papers submitted to universities across the globe, including UMGC. For more information about this and the paper requirements, please review the syllabus.
While there is no set requirement for similarity scores, you should shoot for well below 40%, as anything above this score will trigger a one-on-one discussion with me to determine whether you have plagiarized your sources, even if inadvertently.
*You may also revise and re-submit your paper multiple times to improve your similarity score, if needed. I will only evaluate the similarity score of your final submission.
Please review the following information carefully before submitting your paper:
The class project for this course is a written report, that addresses the biological study of a specific behavioral or mental phenomenon (normal or pathological) covered in the readings and videos. Please select a behavioral or mental phenomenon such as language or schizophrenia and then select a biological strategy for investigating it, such as hormonal or genetic mechanisms, neurotransmitters, drug treatments, or localization of brain processes by imaging. The project will be worth a maximum of 100 points.
Written paper. As an example, the theme of your report might be imaging approaches to the study of schizophrenia. Your paper should summarize fundamental issues, questions, and controversies and provide a general overview of the topic using the biological line of investigation you chose. It should also elaborate on your understanding of the brain processes that are revealed through imaging research in schizophrenia. To accomplish this, you will have to use recent research articles (published within the last five years) to illustrate relevant points. You may use any of a number of electronic databases to find research articles that deal with your topic, including the library and the Internet. The one requirement for the research articles that you select is that two of them must have appeared in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. You may wish to consult with the library staff or your faculty member to confirm whether a particular journal is peer-reviewed.
Newspaper or magazine articles should not be used as your major reference, but they are sometimes useful when they lead you to the appropriate research article. You should avoid simply repeating the articles in summary form, but rather use them within the text of your paper to illustrate important points. You are welcome to discuss your choice of topic with your faculty member to make sure you are on the right track.
Your paper should be 1,600 words, or about 6 to 8 pages, in length (use the word count as a guide to length and stay within 200 words of the target to avoid penalties). It must be typed, double-spaced, with one-inch margins, and fully referenced in APA format (seehttp://www.apa.org). Please check the course schedule in this syllabus for the due date. The penalty for a late project is ten percent of the score on the project.
You may wish to submit a draft of your complete or near complete paper to the Effective Writing Center (EWC at http://www.umgc.edu/writingcenter/writingresources… ) for review and comment, prior to the due date of the paper. This should be submitted well in advance of the due date, in order for the EWC to respond and for you to make the necessary corrections. Once you receive feedback from the EWC, you can copy and paste it into a Word Document, then post it in your assignment folder with your project paper by the due date, for your instructor to view as necessary. The EWC can help address questions regarding format, structure, writing style, and appropriateness of references.
Due Date
Dec 7, 2021 11:59 PM
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Project

This question has been answered by our writers. You can buy the answer below or order your 0% plagiarized answer