Please revise: instructor comments are in the previous version of essay!
You provide overview of the topic in the beginning of the paper and wrap up with the main points of the article. Be sure that introduction needs to include the purpose of your critique. Think about appropriate conclusion in critique. You may add strengths and weaknesses of the article concisely in fresh words in conclusion.
You utilize citations from the article and paraphrase them properly and objectively summarize main points. Research procedures (data collection tools/procedures and analysis tool/criteria) and need to be clearly described in an organized way.
In the critical analysis part, constructive criticisms are not developed enough. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the article in your perspectives? Can you specifically show the evidence to make reasonable criticism? Do you think the research design in this study is appropriate for the research goal? Did the author draw conclusions based on results?, etc. Validity of the article in research questions, literature review, research procedures, or drawing conclusions should be discussed in analytic ways using your own rational perspectives. Please be aware that the purpose of this assignment is not to review the article or criticize the topic of the study, but to develop constructive criticism about the research study.
The “minimum” number of words are 750 except a cover page and reference. The “minimum” number of words do not guarantee the quality of contents. Please review that all the sections are described enough and meet the requirements written in instruction and grading rubric.
You provide at least one additional resource, keep the similarity rate low, and follow APA formatting. You may use 2 or 3 level of headings like the sample for more organized writing. Please read the instruction and grading rubrics again and apply my feedback to the next critique.